By Peter Spyns, María-Esther Vidal
This e-book offers a realistic creation to the perform of peer reviewing. even though it in general specializes in paper reviewing for clinical occasions in machine technological know-how and enterprise informatics, the various rules, assistance, tips and examples can be utilized to magazine reviewing and different medical domain names. a few is also used whilst reviewing proposals for study initiatives or offers. furthermore, many elements of the ebook will profit authors of clinical papers, who will achieve deeper insights into how papers are reviewed and for this reason what to be aware of whilst writing their very own papers.
The publication is split into 3 chapters, the 1st of which offers a quick evaluate of why peer reviewing is taken into account to be a big quality controls tool for medical papers. In flip, the second one bankruptcy elaborates at the major ideas a superb reviewer may still adhere to, together with crucial facets of non-public angle s/he should still be aware of whilst writing his/her evaluate. finally, the 3rd bankruptcy encompasses a sequence of (anonymized) genuine lifestyles examples of tangible reviewing perform, therefore illustrating sensible guidance and methods in regards to the commonest “do’s” and “don’ts” of peer reviewing.
The publication bargains a dependent advent and functional reference consultant, together with stable and undesirable examples, for junior researchers in desktop technology and enterprise informatics particularly, in addition to for somebody attracted to peer reviewing in general.<
Read Online or Download Scientific Peer Reviewing: Practical Hints and Best Practices PDF
Best human-computer interaction books
Cellular Peer-to-Peer Computing for subsequent iteration disbursed Environments: Advancing Conceptual and Algorithmic functions specializes in present examine and innovation in cellular and instant applied sciences. This complicated e-book offers researchers, practitioners, and academicians with an authoritative reference resource to the most recent cutting-edge advancements during this becoming know-how box.
Advances in cellular computing, instant communications, cellular positioning, and sensor applied sciences have given upward push to a brand new type of context-aware cellular and ubiquitous purposes. Context-Aware cellular and Ubiquitous Computing for more suitable Usability: Adaptive applied sciences and functions presents thorough insights and demanding learn advancements on cellular applied sciences and companies.
The booklet comprises 3 components. the 1st half, entitled 'Play and Grounding' seems to be at play as a context more likely to demonstrate the essence of grounding. Grounding is the embodiment of realizing things/actions on the subject of and/or built-in with their environments. the second one half, entitled 'Optimal event and Emotion' indicates the shut organization among grounding and emotion.
ELearning – Konzept und Drehbuch ist ein Praxishandbuch, das Medienautoren und Projektleitern Einblick gewährt in die komplexe Vorarbeit für die Realisierung von eLearning-Projekten. Vor diesem Hintergrund beschreibt das Buch, wie Projektleiter und Medienautor in Teamarbeit ein Drehbuch für eLearning erstellen, das lernpsychologischen Kriterien und der aktuellen Multimedia-Didaktik gerecht wird.
- Content Preparation Guidelines for the Web and Information Appliances: Cross-Cultural Comparisons
- Human-Computer Interaction (3rd Edition)
- User-Centered Web Development
- Pervasive Haptics: Science, Design, and Application
Additional resources for Scientific Peer Reviewing: Practical Hints and Best Practices
It also helps to estimate the time and effort you may want to spend on reviewing. Reviewing for a high-impact journal requires more time, attention, and scrutiny than an informally organized workshop. Of course, this is not a plea minimizing on time spent on reviews for workshops. • Dare to Decide Organizers or editors invite reviewers for their expertise and renown and entrust them with the responsibility to help them to decide on acceptance or rejection. A neutral position is thus in general not very useful.
A good reviewer has to make himself/herself acquainted with these idiosyncrasies and comply with them. For example, it is pointless to reject a submission due to a lacking evaluation section if the call for contributions targets short position papers with visions for future trends. It is bad for your reputation as a reviewer when chairs and submitters discover that you did not bother to familiarize yourself with the context of the call for papers. It also helps to estimate the time and effort you may want to spend on reviewing.
1007/978-3-319-25084-7_3 29 30 3 Tips and Tricks 15 pages. Do not hesitate to reject such an out-of-scope paper without much ado. A reviewer can use his/her time more wisely than writing a serious review for a submission that very obviously does not respect the guidelines of the call for papers. , first paper by junior researchers, undetected methodological flaw, or extremely bad paper structure), you are indeed supposed to clearly explain the main problem(s) (and provide some examples) but not to comment on all the ensuing problems or flaws.
Scientific Peer Reviewing: Practical Hints and Best Practices by Peter Spyns, María-Esther Vidal